The judge allows the authors of the copyright issues of artificial intelligence against a dead person to move forward

The federal judge allows prosecution’s copyright cases against Mita to move forward, although he rejected part of the lawsuit.

In Kadrey vs. Meta, authors, including Richard Kadri, Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates, claimed that Mita had violated intellectual property rights by using their books to train Lama AI models, and that the company removed copyright information from its books to hide this alleged violation.

Meanwhile, Meta claimed that her training is qualified for fair use, and he has argued that the case should be rejected because the authors lack standing. In the court last month, the American provincial judge, Vince Chapria, appeared to indicate that it was Against separationBut he also criticizes what he saw as a “above -summit” letter from the legal teams of the authors.

On Friday to ruleChapria wrote that the claim of violation of copyright is “clearly sufficiently a tangible injury to stand” and that the authors “have claimed enough that Mita has been removed from CMI deliberately [copyright management information] To hide the violation of copyright. “

“These allegations combined, raising” a reasonable conclusion, if not in particular, “Chapria wrote, as Meta removed CMI to try to prevent Lama from removing CMI and thus revealing that he was trained in copyright -protected materials.”

However, the judge rejected the authors’ claims related to the law access to computers and comprehensive fraud in California (CDAFA), because “they did not claim that dead had reached computers or their servers – only their data (in the form of their books).”

The lawsuit has already provided some glimpses on how Meta deals with copyright, with the court depositing the prosecutors who claim this Mark Zuckerberg gave the permission of the Lama team To train models using copyright and other works The members of the definition team discussed the use of the lawless content To train artificial intelligence.

The courts weigh a number of publishing rights lawsuits at the present time, including A lawsuit against the New York Times against Openai.