- Federal spending increases despite the aggressive discounts of promotion6 % climb on a yearly basis in the first months of Trump. At the same time, the real cost of workers, legal battles, and employment may be more taxpayers than the cuts themselves.
Although ELON Musk is promising trillion dollars in savings, federal spending is still climbing.
The cost -cutting team has slipped through the government, closing agencies, laying workers, and canceling billions of dollars in contracts. According to the official Doge website, the administration, which is unofficially headed by the Musk billionaire, saved the government about $ 160 billion.
However, these reported savings have not yet led to a significant decrease in public government spending this year, according to Pennsylvania non -partisan budget model, Which monitors the weekly treasury data.
Instead, the model shows that government spending has risen on an annual basis in the four months since Donald Trump became president. The report found that the total expenditures increased by 6.3 % (about 156 billion dollars) since Trump took office compared to the first four months of 2024. Even after the inflation was controlled, the federal government recorded an additional 81.2 billion dollars in spending during the same period, the model director Smetters said Politico.
Duji spokesman did not immediately respond wealth Request a comment, which was conducted outside normal working hours.
Dog’s discounts may cost more than providing
Musk, who served as a non -paid “private government employee”, who advises Dog, said he is planning to evacuate the White House and is likely to step down in late May. During his term, Dog’s face and led many aggressive discounts of the team to the federal workforce.
However, critics argue that Musk discounts may generate waste more than they removed. Many major savings in Dog were presented by reducing the number of employees in the federal workforce significantly.
About 250,000 federal employees have left or are to leave their jobs. This number includes more than 112,000 who joined the deferred resistance program, for each a Politico Review previous reports and management sources, in addition to about 121,000 employees at the agency who have been terminated, according to For CNN analysis.
This collective migration of federal workers may reduce salary obligations, but also threatens the government’s ability to perform cash work, including collecting revenues from tax audit.
Public service estimates partnership that DOGE procedures may cost taxpayers about $ 135 billion. With the Federal Manpower of 2.3 million withdrawn $ 270 billion in annual salaries, Max Stir, CEO of the non -profit organization, argues that the joint expenses for launching employees and re -employing employees on paid leave, and resulting productivity losses amount to nearly half -salaries.
“We need our government to work better, but the methods that have been adopted so far take us in the delicate wrong direction.” It was previously said luck.
He said: “The final result will be that the American public will carry the bag as Elon Musk returns to its own institutions.”
Doug’s savings are unconfirmed
Doug’s savings claims were also scrutinized. The team numbers have It continuously included inaccuracy and enlarged numbers, Neglecting criticism of the chaotic team approach and the lack of government experience.
The team publishes part of their savings publicly via the “receipt wall” on their website, which lists some contracts, grants and canceled real estate. However, Dog says that the receipts provided on the site only represent about 30 % of full savings, making the upper number not verified.
Even the chosen savings presented by Doge for Public Review were not reliable. For example, the team removed many contracts from the receipt wall after the media investigations are suspicious. In one case, Dog reduced her largest contract from 8 billion dollars to 8 million dollars when the seller explained that the number of $ 8 billion was likely to be a written error.
This story was originally shown on Fortune.com
